Hosted By
We make claims about Bitcoin's assurances all the time. It is censorship resistant, it's open and permissionless, it's counterfeit proof, etc. But are these things entirely true? When someone wants to acquire, use, or validate Bitcoin, how well do the claims match reality?
Today we cover another great article from @nic_carter titled: "Unpacking Bitcoin's Assurances." Don't forget to follow Nic on Twitter and Medium, and drop some applause on the original article at the link below:
https://medium.com/@nic__carter/unpacking-bitcoins-assurances-a3c98824d3f0
Mentioned again because it always seems to come up in discussion, the great piece by @hasufl and @zhusu about Bitcoin as an independent system for property rights:
https://anchor.fm/thecryptoconomy/episodes/CryptoQuikRead_225---Bitcoin--the-Promise-of-Independent-Property-Rights-e3j6b8
If you love the show and would like to support and get access to the exclusive Cryptoconomy telegram group, become a patron below!
https://www.patreon.com/thecryptoconomy
“I believe that Satoshi Nakamoto, Whoever he/she/it/them is/was, was first and foremost a strategist of the cypherpunk traditions. This is extremely important because we...
"What would it seem like if it did seem like a global, digital, sound, open source, programmable money was monetizing from absolute zero?" -...
To think that a hard monetary asset, with a perfectly inelastic supply, could go from a $0 market with no infrastructure, liquidity, or demand,...
![CryptoQuikRead_281 - Unpacking Bitcoin's Assurances [Nic Carter]](https://episodes.castos.com/6626b866f2af87-36468692/images/1741323/c1a-9mg94-mq8r0386t4gw-gonlc9.jpg)