Hosted By
We make claims about Bitcoin's assurances all the time. It is censorship resistant, it's open and permissionless, it's counterfeit proof, etc. But are these things entirely true? When someone wants to acquire, use, or validate Bitcoin, how well do the claims match reality?
Today we cover another great article from @nic_carter titled: "Unpacking Bitcoin's Assurances." Don't forget to follow Nic on Twitter and Medium, and drop some applause on the original article at the link below:
https://medium.com/@nic__carter/unpacking-bitcoins-assurances-a3c98824d3f0
Mentioned again because it always seems to come up in discussion, the great piece by @hasufl and @zhusu about Bitcoin as an independent system for property rights:
https://anchor.fm/thecryptoconomy/episodes/CryptoQuikRead_225---Bitcoin--the-Promise-of-Independent-Property-Rights-e3j6b8
If you love the show and would like to support and get access to the exclusive Cryptoconomy telegram group, become a patron below!
https://www.patreon.com/thecryptoconomy
"I didn’t believe it when I first heard people saying that most crypto projects will fail. Boy was I wrong." - @Vanalli Take it...
What if “hoarding” money is both realizing its most important utility, and stabilizing in an uncertain economy? If true, how could the exact opposite...
"The greatest trick that central banks ever pulled was convincing the world that individuals must perpetually take risk just to preserve value already created...
![CryptoQuikRead_281 - Unpacking Bitcoin's Assurances [Nic Carter]](https://episodes.castos.com/6626b866f2af87-36468692/images/1741323/c1a-9mg94-mq8r0386t4gw-gonlc9.jpg)