Hosted By
Lightning is complicated, difficult to use, sometimes doesn't work properly, requires a lot of learning and experimentation, and is still a risky place to hold Bitcoin funds. Doesn't this make it a protocol destined to obscurity and disuse? Doesn't it mean that better, simpler options will simply replace it, and Bitcoin is to fail from its extensive limitations? Find out all the ways I find Lightning *doesn't* do its job well, & what I think it means for the future in today's Guy's Take episode!
Mentioned in the show:
paywall.link
pollofeed.com
schnorr signatures
previous Guy's take on the complexity of the internet
A great piece today detailing out the different kinds, the nuances & the long history of inflation. What misconceptions do we still have about...
"But there is something even more interesting that happens with mining and electricity. Not only does Bitcoin mining add revenue to existing locations of...
Another excellent piece from Su Zhu and Hasu at uncommoncore.co and a great introduction to the dynamics and risks at stake in the cashless...
