CryptoQuikRead_260 - Why America Can't Regulate Bitcoin [beautyon_]

June 13, 2019 00:48:14
CryptoQuikRead_260 - Why America Can't Regulate Bitcoin [beautyon_]
Bitcoin Audible
CryptoQuikRead_260 - Why America Can't Regulate Bitcoin [beautyon_]

Jun 13 2019 | 00:48:14

/

Hosted By

Guy Swann

Show Notes

This one should not be skipped!   

There is a fascinating precedent set by case law and the long battles over PGP and US "munitions" laws, that gives us a rather clear conclusion on how Bitcoin should be treated by the US government.  The short version?  Bitcoin is speech, plain and simple, and should be subject to a total of *0* federal or state laws on money transmission, KYC/AML, financial regulations, etc. This is not an opinion, but an objective and clear truth. Listen to a thorough argument from @beautyon_ explaining exactly why.

Don't forget to drop some applause on the original article over at the HackerNoon Medium page:
https://hackernoon.com/why-america-cant-regulate-bitcoin-8c77cee8d794

Below is another excellent article by @beautyon_ we covered recently about Bitcoin, and the nature of system critical software:
https://anchor.fm/thecryptoconomy/episodes/CryptoQuikRead_254---Bitcoin--Software-Reliability-e46lnu

--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/bitcoinaudible/message

Other Episodes

Episode

June 02, 2024 01:13:34
Episode Cover

Read_824 - Ecash is Self-Custodial

"Fedimint is a scalable self-custodial off-chain programmability layer on top of Bitcoin. It allows for use cases that are difficult, time-consuming, and unscalable for...

Listen

Episode

July 24, 2018 00:19:05
Episode Cover

CryptoQuikRead_116 - Coindesk & Jake Chervinsky on the Bitcoin ETFs

Today we have a dual QuikRead with Nikhilesh De's Coindesk article regarding the Direxion ETF and the SEC's decision to postpone until September. Plus...

Listen

Episode

July 12, 2018 00:25:23
Episode Cover

CryptoQuikRead_110 - Adversaries, Distributed Ledgers, and Decentralization [Sarah Jamie Lewis]

“Given an adversarial environment I don’t believe you can maintain secure decentralized consensus AND have timely confirmation between arbitrary parties AND scale up to...

Listen